
For our October discussion of Telex From Cuba, we were lucky enough to have author Rachel Kushner join us for a Q&A session. Here's a quick rundown of some of the things the group discussed and some of Rachel's answers to the questions we asked her.
Several readers agreed that the setting -- American-owned plantations in 1950s Cuba -- was just as fascinating as (and for some, even more than) the specific characters themselves. We asked Rachel: "Which came first: characters or setting?" She said the characters, but then she said she knew she wanted to write about Americans in Cuba in the 1950s. So it seems that they were intricately linked from the beginning. Some of the most evocative writing was her depiction of the cane fire near the beginning of the novel. I felt covered in sweat and soot as I was reading, and I felt recognition. I'm sure the cane fire wasn't so different from the brush fires we experience every year her in Southern California. The way the light is eerily orange and the air takes on new qualities...
An interesting tidbit that came up is that the biographical info on the hardcover is different from the paperback. On the hardcover, it mentions that some of Rachel's relatives lived in Cuba in the 1950s. That information was removed on the paperback, and Rachel explained. The historical fact may have led her to the topic, and it may have provided her with some great research sources in Cuba and elsewhere, but the novel is not a retelling of her family's experiences. It's a fine line between giving the reader useful info and leading them to make assumptions that may not be true. She mentioned Rivka Galchen's Atmospheric Disburbances (the next Coyotes selction) as another example where the biographical info on the jacket copy may skew the reader's perception of the novel.
We asked her about the characters in the novel that ARE based on actual historical figures. For me, the Castros were a necessary presence, but the other cameos (Hemingway, Lucy and Desi, etc) felt a little distracting. Rachel said that they weren't meant to be meaningful characters -- they were there to lend authenticity to the setting. Perhaps the most interesting coincidence is that Rachel K., the dancer in Havana, was NOT a foil for the author (a tendency that pops up in fiction a lot these days). There was an actual dancer/spy in Cuba who went by the name Rachel K. They considered changing the name to avoid confusion, but instead, they decided to honor the coincidence by keeping the name. As a reader, however, I just assumed the author inserted herself as one of the more powerful and interesting female characters (no shame in that). I don't often delve deeper into research when reading fiction, especially when the novel is as readable and immersing as this one.
Curiously, a majority of the group members felt that the voice of K.C. Stites, the only first person narrator, didn't feel particularly "male." Some thought it was the diction and syntax, others cited his role in the family, still others his observations and thoughts. Rachel said that she hadn't heard that critique before. She said that readers must fight the urge to put the author's identity behind the "I" in a novel (and authors must remind them). I think this links back to our discussion of biographical information as well.
Finally, I asked Rachel where she was when she heard about the National Book Award nomination. The announcement was made at noon in New York, so it was morning in LA when the phone call came, breakfast time for her son. When he started fussing, her mother who was visiting said, "This is your life now! Don't ignore him for more phone calls from New York!" So the announcement was quick. Did it change things for her? She wished she could say it didn't. After all, who writes just for recognition? But after the announcement, she got invitations to speak much more often. She said you can enjoy the recognition when you get it, but it isn't why you write. She also sees the danger in getting a nomination so early. As a writer, you have to steel yourself to make sure you don't go looking around for it the next time. She seems to have a very level-headed approach, and it was great to hear more about the book and her POV as a writer.
Afterwards, she stuck around and chatted and signed people's books. It was pretty cool. I love my job. :)









